On this site:Home
Other links:Thesis how-to's
AI at AAAI
AI in CS
AI videos @ SRI
Hints for research studentsThis page was designed to provide computer science students with basic tips and tricks for their research project. If you are one of these, we hope that these tips will be very useful to you.
Before we start, take a look at these two papers. They will answer a lot of the fundamental questions on how to write a thesis or conduct research. Then we will add some more tips on topics that these articles do not tackle.
Starting a Research Project
Reading Related WorkOnce you have worked out what is currently going on in your field, you might want to check some other publications. Either consult the respective homepages or use search engines (e.g. www.scienceindex.com, or a bibliography data base). Don't forget the NECI Scientific Literature Digital Library for computer science research papers. It allows Boolean keyword searches -- including title, author, reference, URL tags and the contents of pdf/ps files (!)-- that it has found on the Web. Additionally, check out the workshops that are held at the big conferences (a schedule for national and international conferences can be found at the Gesellschaft für Informatik). Another good point to check for current research are journals (Elsevier offers an online search for all their journals, if you need navigation aid for AI literature, check the ranking of AI journals, which is based on the science index from the Institute for Scientific Information). In this context, you may want to try this site on critical reading.
Although you are a very intelligent and creative person, people in the research community are very likely to have thought of similar problems and solutions as you do. They are also very likely to have not thought of exactly the same problems and the same solutions as your have. The similarities and differences are a very thoughtful source of new ideas. An hour reading is an hour well spent.
However, finding the right literature is a challenging task. A very good starting point are the proceedings of most important conferences in your field. If you can make out prominent researchers in your field, look for others that cite them.
Also try to find review papers of the related fields. Finding related fields can be somewhat difficult. Strategies for finding them include: browse web indices like Yahoo!, ask yourself what your results could be used for and look for the corresponding fields, or you can attend a workshop/ conference where people will tell you.
Writing a Scientific Text
We strongly recommend that you do not start writing at the computer. Always draft your ideas on paper. This is not old fashioned, you will use a modern word processing system later. However, the change of the medium from draft to final version forces you to think through your main ideas once more. Drafting using a computer does not do this. Many times we discovered new ideas in our own drafts that appeared to be in there but of which we had not thought when writing them down for the first time.
Do not underestimate the value of backups, both of your paper drafts and your text files on the computer. We recommend that you back-up on at least four levels:
Not only will this help you in an emergency. It will also make you feel safe so you do not have to worry about the odd system crash.
Writing a paper
Once you have achieved progress in your work, try to find a conference or workshop where you can publish your findings/ideas. Mailing lists are usually the best means to learn about "call for papers". Once you have found a place where to publish, you need to think of how to write your ideas up. If you want to make sure your effort is not crushed by the referees, check who is in the program committee. Truth to be known, they will check if you have read their work and you should make sure that you know how their work relates to yours. But there is also another important reason to look at their work: if you submit something to their workshop you are very likely to be doing something similar to their work. There is nothing more embarrassing than finding out that they already have done something similar, without you noticing it!
Some other rules of thumb that may help you getting your paper accepted:
Using TeX for word processingIn your Linux installation you will find (in my SuSE 6.2 at any rate):
Style and Layout for a paper
How to citeThere are many styles you can use to cite works of other authors in different disciplines and even in computer science there is no commonly accepted style. E.g. works can be cited using keys in the folloging styles: [RUNO95],  and (Russell and Norvig, 1995). We recommend the latter, as it allows the reader to easily recognise the referred work without need to look up the keys in the references section.
Be aware that it is considered bad style to use the key as the subject of your sentence, rather use the key at the end of the sentence like in "it has often been claimed that ... (e.g. Russell and Norvig, 1995)". If you need to refer to the authors in your text, use phrases like: "as Russell and Norvig (1995) state, ...", where the year of publication is put in brackets and placed right after the occurence of the author's names.
In your references section you list your references alphabetically by the first authors last name. For different kinds of publications, different rules apply for how to provide the information to retrieve that publication. However, every entry starts with the extended key (authors last names, abbreviated first names) and is followed by the publiation year in brackets. Remember to highlight (by using italics) the most important part of the citation, which is not the title of the work itself, but the title of "the thing that rests on the shelf". Thus, for an article in a book, you do not highlight the title of the article, but the title of the book. Which is a complicated way of saying what you can easily see when you look at the following examples:
Presenting a paper
If you present your work at a conference, spend only very little time on presenting the results themselves. People are usually more interested in models and techniques rather than your actual results. So give only a gist of your results. Remember that you have only little time to present your ideas. Make this time most interesting to advertise your paper.If people doubt your findings, you can tell them about the results in the discussion afterwards (or they can read the paper).
Remember that your presentation is about getting input on your project, it is not about becoming famous (that may happen later, when you get your Nobel prize ;-). The computer science community is expanding, so it will take some time and persistance to make your name and your ideas known.
Keep in mind that you have usually between 20 and 25 minutes for your presentation, with 10 to 5 min left for discussion. This is handled very rigidly so practicing/timing is crucial. Discussion is maybe the most important part of your presentation: you can gather information, convince skeptics, and also establish contact with other people. So, try to think up hypothetical questions and answers to them; it's also a good idea to know related work.
Last but not least: humor is a very good catalyst for attention and absorbtion of new information. Putting in some funny remarks or examples might help you in keeping the audience awake and making them understand. However, beware of artificial funniness!
Designing OHP slides
Many errors can be made when designing slides. Following these guidelines will prevent you from making the most obvious ones. And you join a great community: These guidelines stem from the organizing commitee of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence and are identical to the guidelines form the American Association for Artificial Intelligence.
In any case, you should make sure that you have enough time to exercise your talk. Experience shows that you should plan for 2 to 3 minutes per slide, but this also depends on the content of the slides. If you have excercised the talk two or three times with the correct timing and without any major mistakes, you will feel a lot more comfortable and your audience will be thankful for a well prepared presentation. One last note: only a handful of speakers are so experienced that they do not use any notes for helping them out during the talk. It is usually a good idea to have the important keywords, the structure of your talk and the most important points you want to make in a written form with you. We recommend you use little palm-sized cards for such notes: it's easy for you to handle them during your talk (you will need one free hand for your slides or the computer) and they suffice to help you out in case you forgot what you wanted to say next.
On these cards you indicate the order of the points you want to make (remember that you exercise the talk a couple of times, so you know most of your points already by heart). You also write down difficult but important sentences and phrase, so you have them ready if you do not get it right at the time you are presenting. In case you do not need the cards for a number of slides, but need to go back to it, it is useful to have the slide number on the card, so you can find the right card quickly. Also write down a numbering of your cards (just in case you drop them ;-).
For more details and a procedure on how to develop the contents of you presentation look at Markus Roggenbachs tips and Wolfang Coys tips (german).
Before you start thinking of how to do the practical part of your thesis, we suggest you think again about what is feasible: do you have access to the right hardware? Which effort is absolutely necessary (workload usually increases unexpectedly during the project, so keep open spaces in your initial schedule)? You should also try to become as independend as possible from certain platforms, hardware, software. Otherwise your project becomes accident-prone and you may spend a lot of time waiting for someone to fix something without being able to do anything useful. Also reflect the following note:
Meta books:Diese Bücher sind kein direktes Muss für das Verfassen der Arbeit, dienen aber den berühmten "Soft-skills". Eine Investition an dieser Stelle zahlt sich mit Sicherheit aus.
ZeitmanagementSeiwert, L. (1998). Wenn Du es eilig hast, gehe langsam. Campus Fachbuch.
StudierenKnigge-Illner, H., und Kruse, O. (1994). Studieren mit Lust und Methode. Deutscher Studienverlag.
SchreibenKruse, O. (1999). Keine Angst vor dem leeren Blatt. campus concret.
RhetorikKellner, H. (2000). Rhetorik. Hanser Verlag.
Related sites:These sites may be of additonal help to you:
A last word before you go (Edsger Dijkstra's tips for PhD students):
Many thanks go to Chris Kray, Andreas Gerber, Alastair Burt and Hans-Jürgen Bürckert for contributing a lot of tips to this page!
Last updated on February 15, 2003.
If you know of some more tips, please contact email@example.com